And how have your articles to this point not been that of the climate fatalist? Because this is the first time you've argued against those kinds of people.

I've read too many of your articles over the years. The only difference between the cilmate fatalists that you talk about you is that you make a living writing articles about why everyone should be a climate fatalist. Are you starting to feel just a little guilty because of the influence? Or maybe you're realizing if everybody takes you seriously then you won't be relevant anymore and you're spinning that your not a climate fatalist? You're just a doomcryer. There's a difference and I'm you're tell us why - you know, after you write twenty or thirty more articles essentially telling eveyrbody to be a climate fatalist.

By the way, dressing up nihilism as deep thought and telling everyone to give up, literally the point of every article you've written to this point. Again, you're describing yourself and arguing that you don't like people like that. You must be a kick at parties.