Bravo. And of course all of this omits all of the uman rights abuses the other nations commit. The sins committed by other nations somehow never get listed by these historians such as Zinn or Chomsky or are excused because Americans actions are somehow worse. None of the nations you've listed are anywhere near as good on human rights as the United States is but by the morality of the left because it is not done for purely altruistic reasons but rather geopolitical ones it doesn't count. This same philosophy fuels revisionist historians on domestic policy as well in we because America was founded on white supremacy, any good that it has done for its people is stained irrevocably. This actually pre-dates these historians and goes back to William Lloyd Garrison, publisher of the anti-slavery newspaper The liberator who believed that slavery was purely a moral evil, that the Constitution was illegal as a result and that there was no political solution that could be done to solve it. He spent his career advocating that politicians who fought to defeat it were impure because they were PART of a corrupt system. He had no real solution to end slavery aside from a kind of banal activisim that was out of step with his fellow abolitionists.

I'm writing a series about this that will be published later on. However I write these because after the Civil War ended Garrison shut down the liberator and founded The Nation, the most left-wing publication in the country. They are among those who have been the most adamant about the evils of Gaza - and published an editorial arguing that neither Harris nor Trump could resolve the situation satuisfactorally - and that the future of democracy would make no difference no matter who won. You might want to add that to the mix.