See you keep making the mistake of using such things as 'the law' and 'court decisions' and 'history' to define what genocide is. When as all of these people who have told you, genocide always follows this simple definition:

Whoever is IN CHARGE of a country is the majority and is therefore and always will be THE OPRESSOR.

Any actions it takes against a minority of its population, even in defense and even in reaction to violence is ALWAYS IMMORAL

The segment of the country that is a MINORITY of the population is therefore always the OPPRESSED. Therefore any actions they take, even if they are violent and involve death, are ALWAYS RIGHTEOUS AND JUSTIFIED.

This is true even if the majority is NOT prejudiced towards other minority groups, such as women or gays and the minority group is vehemently so. It is why many of these people can denounce Trump as anti-semitic because he said there would 'good people in Charlottesville on both sides' and then campaign with the pro-Palestine marchers and not see the contradiction. You see Jews are the minority here AND therefore opprssed. However, these people on the left, most of whom are gentile, know far more about the situation in iSRAEL and therefore any Jew who supports Israel is a bigot themselves. Even the fact Jews themselves survived a genocide and might have a better idea of what it means to suffer one is of course irrelevant in the leftist view of history.

I have learned far too often that the extreme left and all its members are as impervious to reason as their counterparts on the extreme right. Their behaivor in Israel had confirmed that, for all their talk of 'equality' and morality, they are the same: morally bankrupt, only wishing to tolerate their own, and incapable of their ideals with a reality of the world. For many of them, even to participate in the politcal process is beneath them They are not the solution to the problem of partisan gridlock; they're a part of the problem and they are proud of it.